The crying of lot 49

No cover

Thomas Pynchon, Thomas Pynchon: The crying of lot 49 (Paperback, 1982, Bantam Books)

Paperback

Published Nov. 8, 1982 by Bantam Books.

ISBN:
978-0-553-22724-6
Copied ISBN!

View on OpenLibrary

4 stars (4 reviews)

11 editions

Goodreads Review of The Crying of Lot 49 by Thomas Pynchon

3 stars

This was a re-read for me, figured I'd read it on a train to New York, finished it on the way back. I definitely enjoyed it more than I did the first time around, I think because I was way young when I first read it and didn't understand it's place in the literary canon, or what it was trying to do. But with that being said, I still didn't know what the hell was going on or what I was supposed to take away from it. It is just as dense and inaccessible as I remember, but there were several moments that made me laugh during this read because I caught a reference I know I didn't catch before. I probably won't re-read it again knowing my feelings still stand despite being older, but it was fun.

C'est fou

4 stars

Premier contact avec Pynchon suite aux recommandation d'une amie. Et oh boy, what a ride.

Le début, c'est Oedipa, une femme avec sa vie, ses problèmes, son mari hypersensible et son psychiatre avec un drôle d'accent allemand qui se retrouve exécutrice testamentaire pour un milliardaire qu'elle a connu autrefois. Mais ce n'est qu'un prétexte, car très vite Oedipa va se retrouvée plongée dans un mystère.

Je ne divulgâcherai pas, et quand bien même je le ferai ça n'aurait pas grand sens. Rien n'est clair ni clairement expliqué dans le récit. Oedipa court après des symboles, des bouts de sens qui sont cachées dans des recoins de bars et des boîtes postales sous des bretelles d'autoroute. Oedipa rencontre des personnages un peu foutraques (qui sont à peu près tous horny pour elle, c'est un peu gênant et ça m'a un peu sorti du texte). Chaque graine de sens qu'elle obtient s'accompagne …

Review of 'The Crying of Lot 49' on 'Storygraph'

3 stars

The back cover says “comic talent” and “wild humour” but I didn’t get it. There was one hilarious seduction scene early on and the characters are quite amusing but I found the most of it rather dull.

The writing reminded me of the Ipcress File which I read earlier in the year and they were published 4 years apart n the 1960s so this post modern splurge of multi page paragraphs was obviously the thing back then. Now it reads like a NANOWRIMO project someone would churn out in one month.

The worst parts are the endless information dumps about the Courier’s Tragedy. I only finished it because it was mercifully short and I don’t think I’ll be trying any more Pynchon.